@sock_monkey I often feel out-of-step with modern Horror film taste, so...You're not alone, lol!
It’s nice to hear it’s not just me!
My nephew and his girlfriend saw it in the theater and hated it, so my expectations were in the gutter, which might explain why I responded so positively. I wonder if, in upon a revisit in a few years, we both start drifting in each other’s direction, eventually settling at some mean of a 7. Expectations have a huge sway in initial perception after all.
Very possibly. One movie that also offered something different and one to which I went into blind a few years ago, and still think about to this day, is Vivarium. For those in this thread who haven't seen it I'd highly recommend it. I loved it.
My nephew and his girlfriend saw it in the theater and hated it, so my expectations were in the gutter, which might explain why I responded so positively. I wonder if, in upon a revisit in a few years, we both start drifting in each other’s direction, eventually settling at some mean of a 7. Expectations have a huge sway in initial perception after all.
Very possibly. One movie that also offered something different and one to which I went into blind a few years ago, and still think about to this day, is Vivarium. For those in this thread who haven't seen it I'd highly recommend it. I loved it.
I loved VIVARIUM! I’m glad to see others give it some love because it was barely a blip on the movie-going consciousness, then disappeared. It has surreal, TWILIGHT ZONE vibe, which I really liked.
Halloween Horror Movie #7:
Don't Look Now (1973): Nicholas Roeg's famous adaptation of the Daphne du Maurier short story of the same name is often cited as one of the best horror movies of all time. Centered on a married couple (Donald Sutherland and Julie Christie) during their time in Venice a year after the accidental drowning of their young daughter, the film slowly allows the horror to seep in through the story's edges: Two older women, one blind and claiming to be psychic, appear to be insinuating themselves into the couple's lives with promises of a connection to the dead and, in the background, dead bodies possibly the victim of a single killer begin to pile up, while the city of Venice itself appears to be crumbling beneath our protagonists' feet. All of this builds to a famous climax that I won't spoil. It's all beautifully made and the actors are fantastic, yet I found myself oddly detached the entire time. In a very real way, it was like watching a horror movie through an arthouse director's perspective (which Roeg clearly is), who may be more interested in the craft than the effect. I appreciated it, but I don't know how much I liked it. This one could be grower for me, but as of right now, I'm grading a little low.
Grade: C+
Last night was an "Anna Night", named after my son's girlfriend. She comes over for dinner and a movie a few times a week, and last night we watched THE SHINING, which I absolutely hate. The kids enjoyed it, but thought it was too "old-fashioned". For sure, the outrageous 70s clothes and decor were an eyesore, and very distracting. I hate the kid that played Danny, Duvall and Nicholson were woefully miscast, and the film is missing any trace of nuance or character development. I much prefer the King-approved mini-series. Hoping to show her DOCTOR SLEEP next week, which I consider to be a modern masterpiece.
we watched THE SHINING, which I absolutely hate
I saw it when it was released - before I'd read the story - and didn't think it was too bad. Definitely relied more on jump scares and didn't really allow tension/dread to build. I know that King has expressed his dislike of that adaptation.
After reading the book I saw the movie again and was much more disappointed... there's so much great stuff that Kubrik didn't include which could have made the movie so much better.
I don't remember watching the later mini-series. I'll have to find the time to do that.